Questions You Should Answer Before A Divorce Is Started

Consideration was given for the editing and publication of this post.

Every single divorce will be really hard to deal with. The event is truly life altering. If the situation will be contentious, everything will be even harder to deal with. It is really important that you are careful and that you deal with everything properly. Filing the divorce is a vital step you should know a lot about. Hiring a family law attorney in Tampa or wherever you live is very important but before you do all that, be sure you will go through the following questions.

Do You Know The Financial Situation?

It is important to understand your income and expenses, liabilities and assets. There are also employee benefits that are going to be taken into account during the divorce, together with the possible insurance policies. Credit reports can be gained from the agencies and you basically need to learn all that you can about the finances of the entire team.

What Will Be The Case With Minor Children?

Whenever minor children are involved, you have to think about support and custody. Reaching agreements with the spouse is something that is hard to do. It is really important that you basically know all that you can about the situation and consulting with an attorney is almost always the necessity in the event you did not come to a mutual agreement already. It is normally common to be faced with differing expectations so planning everything appropriately is something that should be remembered.

What About The Marital Home?

Besides retirement accounts, the biggest asset involved in divorces is normally the marital home. The decision is normally really easy in most cases since there is no single side that would afford the home alone. However, in other situations we have both or one of the sides that wants the property. When you fight for the home it is really important that you understand all that you can about finances. Current mortgage amount has to be understood, together with different liens that may exist.

How Will Personal Property Be Divided?

Married couples also have different personal belongings that exist and that need to be properly divided. It is highly tempting to fight over things that are not of a high importance so discussing the personal property is definitely something that is very important. Before a divorce will start, be sure you make a good list of everything that will fall into the personal property category. This can easily help to remove the surrounding drama associated with the split.

Will Health Insurance Count?

The last thing you should understand is that in so many divorces one of the spouses will cover the other one when looking at health insurance. Divorces are finalized and health insurance simply goes away. Coverage can be extended in a court of law but this will never actually happen forever. Always look at all the alternatives since this is really important. Health insurance is something that few people actually take into account so you always want to do this before you are going to start the divorce.

K (A Child: Wardship: Publicity) (No.2) [2013] EWHC 378 (Fam) (08 November 2013)

The Court gave adoptive parents of a child ‘Katie’ who is a ward of court permission to identify themselves as MG and FG the parents of ‘Katie’ in any discussions with the media and permission to refer by name to Jane Dunne (a social work Team Manager), Andy Waugh (Jane Dunne’s manager), Andy Pepper (Deputy Director of Social Services), Colin Green (at the relevant time the Director of Children’s Services) and Bob Dhammi (the Independent Reviewing Officer).

A v A [2013] EWHC 3554 (Fam) (07 November 2013)

The Court made s.37 ICOs in respect of three children returned to the jurisdiction from Pakistan within a long-running very difficult case. The youngest sibling a 3 year old had not been returned to the jurisdiction. The Court held that the children were suffering significant harm as a result of emotional pressure and a false history (believing their Mother to have abandoned them) given to them by the Father.

L (Leave to Oppose Making of Adoption Order) [2013] EWCA Civ 1481 (21 November 2013)

The CA allowed a Mother’s appeal against the refusal of leave to oppose the making of an Adoption Order in circumstances where the prospective adopters had separated and the prospective adoptive mother no longer sought an Adoption Order. The CA held that the Mother’s case should be considered side by side with the other options for the child at the Adoption hearing and that she should be granted leave.

C (A Child) [2013] EWCA Civ 1412 (21 November 2013)

The CA allowed a Father’s appeal against a order prohibiting him from removing his child from the Mother’s care and providing for indirect contact only. The CA identified numerous, serious procedural defects arising largely from the fact that neither party was legally represented and there was no judicial continuity. The conduct of Cafcass was also criticised and guidance given as to the conduct of cases in the light of the loss of public funding. The Court set aside the order, remitting the matter for re-hearing in another court with a Judge to be allocated by the Family Division Liaison Judge. The child was joined as a party NYAS requested to represent him.

In the Matter of KL (A Child) [2013] UKSC 75

The Supreme Court ordered the return of a 7 year old child to Texas. The court upheld the Court of Appeal’s decision that the child habitually resident in this jurisdiction but determined that a return to Texas was nevertheless in his best interests as in the circumstances of the case this would provide the best opportunity for him to develop a proper relationship with both his parents.

Walsall MBS v KK & Anor [2013] EWHC 3192 (Fam) (07 October 2013)

The Court refused a formal request from the Centre for the International Legal Protection of Children and Youth in Bratislava for a transfer of the care proceedings relating to children of Slovakian nationality (who had lived in England all their lives) to Slovakia, pursuant to Article 15 of the Regulation. The court found the Slovak authority to be operating under a misunderstanding of the children’s placement with foster carers.