Tattersall v Tattersall [2013] EWCA Civ 774 (09 July 2013)

The CA refused a Husband appeal against ancillary relief orders. In particular the court considered whether a Mesher order should have been made and concluded that in the light of the Wife’s ‘substantial and protracted contribution to the welfare of the family’ as the primary carer of the parties’ three year old child the Judge’s decision not to make such an order was appropriate.